You may request notification for New Authoring environment (LAMS 2.4): Your input is needed!. |
1:
New Authoring environment (LAMS 2.4): Your input is needed!
By: Ernie Ghiglione
|
12/16/09 09:06 PM | |||
Dear everyone,
As part of LAMS 2.4, we are switching our Authoring interface from Adobe Flash (http://is.gd/5qE4K) to Flex (http://is.gd/5qE6P). Why are we doing thing? The main reason we are doing this is because Flash development is not really a programing framework to create rich web applications. Flash was originally thought to do animations and other "flashy" stuff. Originally when we created the new Flash interface for LAMS 2.0, we had to develop and entire framework (new canvas, widgets, components, etc all from scratch). This has been a serious and difficult undertaking that takes a lot of time and of course, for new developer the learning curve is very very steep taking him/her a looong time to learn how it all works. Flex not only provides a proper development environment (SDK) but also comes with a whole range of libraries and components that can be used to easily create rich internet applications. In practical term, this means that LAMS Authoring will be redesigned to make it easier to maintain. However, we will keep *all* the good features that we have today in our Authoring interface. Now, given that this is a redesign, we want to ask you about features that you think can be improved in the new version. And you can think about improvements, new interface, shortcuts or plain annoying things that you think we should change... anything goes! Just to give you some starters, these are some of the things that we believe can be improved based on the current version: (From Luke) 1) Combined activities - would it be possible to put an empty combined activity skeleton on the sequence and allow the user to put two activities in there themselves - like optional activities? To me it seems like it wouldnt take that much on the java side to do so. Then they could choose any two activities they wished for combined activities 2) Zooming and scrolling. If we have this feature it will be much easier to make large sequences without overcrowding the area. For the scrolling you could use click and drag on the canvas. 2) Branching - Is there a specific reason why branching needs to be in its own expanded canvas? Would it be feasible to have a "branch point" and a "converge point" and have the whole thing in the one canvas? This will be easier if the author area has zooming and scrolling and would make for a more sexy looking workflow. 3) Curvable transitions - I dont want to get too far ahead of myself, but I thought this would be neat (Ernie's suggestions) 4) Tool Activity menu Currently on the left hand side in Authoring we have a list of tools sorted out in alphabetical order. It would be good if we can have different ways to sort the tools such as "Most Used by the user", "Advanced/Basic tools", "Asessment tools", "Collaborative", "External tools (Moodle)", etc... Probably some drop down menu that have these options and according to the one you select the tools get The property inspector is fixed to the canvas, what about if we do a floating window instead? There are a few things in author that unless you know them you wouldn't know they are there. The property inspector is the first one that comes to mind. For instance once you drop an activity into the canvas, unless you double click on the PI, you won't know that is there. So perhaps we should have an option for first time users that gives extra tips when the user is a newbie. For instance after they Over a slow internet connection, loading Authoring might take upto a minute! I believe in Flex there's a way to load certain .swf files "on demand" rather than all at start up. We should look into this option to make it a lot faster to load. -- So, what is *your* suggestion? Anything, doesn't matter how crazy it goes... just go wild and we'll do our best to accommodate for it. Thanks, Ernie Posted by Ernie Ghiglione |
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
Reply to first post on this page
Back to LAMS for Tech-Heads - General Forum