3:
Re: Re: HOW TO: 5 different "characters" in a "play"
By: barry beattie
|
In response to 2 | 02/01/07 08:47 PM | ||
thank you Ernie for your kind reply. I appreciate it.
Using the "Visualization Of Branching/Grouping" diagram you mentioned, here's a curly one for you: Imagine each group on the diagram (G1 - G6) is actually a type of role or character. if you're an actor of that character then you get resources to use and you can chat with others who also play that role (each group 1-6). John, Mary and Benito (G1) can all chat/collaborate about how to play that particular character in the play. However, John, Mary and Benito belong with different actors in their separate performances of the play. E.g: John (G1) plays his part with Yoichi (G2) in one performance, Mary (G1) is with Jacky (G2) in another, the same for Beneito and Manpreet in a third (ignoring groups 3-6 to keep it simple). I have to be very careful with terminology here because what the diagram uses as a "group", I'm thinking "role". For my situation/example, a team/troupe of actors (for want of a better name) is made up of one member from each role. Perhaps a better way to say it is that there are "physical" groups (for assigning people to and for assessment/final product) and a "logical" grouping (what I was going on about "role" - they all do the same job). this could also apply to team projects. Imagine a class of, say, 30 students. Six teams with 5 people each with each team needing to produce one product collaboratively. Each of the 5 people within the team have a different job to do (physical grouping) and there are 6 people doing each of the 5 types of jobs across all the projects (logical grouping). at the moment I'm stuck how to get somewhat towards this goal with LAMS 2.0 (while I eagerly wait for 2.1 to become available). That's why I was looking at "having the same sequence with different content for each 'character'" with LAMS taking care of the "logical grouping" (roles) and assigning students to each role externally to LAMS (physical grouping). But if I do this, I loose the ability to combine people back to their physical groups for collaboration at the end (performing the "play" or project product/outcome) (I hope this all makes sense) any ideas/suggestions greatly appreciated. many thanx again. Posted by barry beattie |
|
||||||||||
|
Reply to first post on this page
Back to Getting Started