Forum Getting Started: Re: Chat and scribe

Back to Getting Started
	Search:

	2: Re: Chat and scribe By: Peter Miller	In response to 1	11/24/05 07:43 AM	[ Reply \| Forward ]
I don't know about fun! I used it last year, second session in. This was probably too much, too soon. With the benefit of hindsight I didn't have, I concur absolutely with the need to brief students in advance. Also, I would suggest keeping the session/sequence simple. The class I was teaching was large-ish (30-40) and new to me (and themselves). I gave a (sketchy?) overview of the role of the scribe and then just let things take their natural course. I found a spectrum of scribe personalities ranging from click-happy people who just wanted to get to the next activity to those who were reticent to the point of invisibility. I wasn't particularly worried about things progressing "lock-step" but not being able to locate scribes easily to sort out their issues added a layer of complexity I didn't need. I would use it again but, as you imply, only with better planning and preparation. Posted by Peter Miller

	3: Re: Re: Chat and scribe By: Angela Voerman	In response to 2	11/27/05 01:12 AM	[ Reply \| Forward ]
Peter, I laughed when I saw the half smile you put here.I helped with a chat and scribe sequence a couple of weeks ago. It was 40 students across two labs,using groups of 5.Of course some groups were together but some were spread between the two rooms. Because of the 'click-happy' behaviour we did lose one scribe (he couldn't get back into his group). But I have to say that despite the mayhem, I would use it again.The students were closely discussing their work (the activity was used to build and reflect upon lecture content) and this was in the form of challenging each other in the online chat as well as orally across the room. In fact I think the clunky behaviour of the tool probably enhanced the activity.I would normally achieve a similar result by dividing students into groups and nominating a person to report back (f2f) but this seemed to provoke a lot of discussion between groups as well as within them. It was good exercise running between computers though, so not for the faint-hearted! Posted by Angela Voerman

Reply to first post on this page

Back to Getting Started