3:
Re: Re: Instructions Tab Question
By: Neal Hirsig
|
In response to 2 | 09/02/09 12:26 PM | ||
Hi Ernie
Thanks again! It does make some sense. It might just be my personal conception of how LAMS is used but it seems that the chance that an individual activity would be used in a sequence both online and offline (thus requiring 2 separate Instruction methods) is quite slim. And from a practical viewpoint, if an activity was used in a sequence as both an online and offline activity, it would require placing 2 activity modules into the sequence (for instance one in each path of a branch) which results in 4 separate places to add instructions (two for each). It has been my experience (which is admittedly limited) that one very useful type of “Instruction” is not available in LAMS (and thus part of my confusion). That is, the need for “sequence” or “lesson” instructions rather than “activity” instructions”. As you noted, reusability is one of the main drives behind LAMS. Each time I have shared a LAMS lesson with a colleague, I have had to include a separate file along with the zip file that explains the sequence as a whole – pointing out the objectives and the pedagogical concepts behind the lesson. There appears to be no place in LAMS to share this sequence or lesson instruction as it does not apply to any particular activity but rather to the whole sequence. It might be useful in some future version of LAMS to expand the export feature to include a form (much like the one used to share sequences on the community site) that can be embedded into the exported zip file and somehow exposed upon import. Neal Hirsig Posted by Neal Hirsig |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Reply to first post on this page
Back to Higher Ed & Training Forum