2:
Re: My Groups 2 levels is not enough
By: Daniel Schneider
|
In response to 1 | 02/14/11 04:49 AM | ||
I think that agree.
1) Although I would favor "module" instead of "lesson" since it's a neutral term. Lesson often refers to something like a 2 hour class and that case a module could be shorter or longer than one physical lesson. Also, in blended teaching and distance teaching, "lesson" is not always meaningful. See for instance how Moodle handles this. Within a course you got weekly (lesson-based) vs. topic (module-based) vs. xxx organization. 2) Don't know about grouping (class-group number). One also could argue that this should be handled within the LAMS sequence. Just don't know :) 3) Level 3 (module/lesson) should not be mandatory, else interfaces with LMSs will become complicated and also some teachers may prefer a flat organization. No idea how to handle this ... While we discuss features, there is also the class cloing issue, i.e. a teacher ought to able to create a new class as copy of prior class (like in most LMSs). Anyhow, not so important for me, since we use LAMS through Moodle basically. - greetings - Daniel Posted by Daniel Schneider |
|
||||||||||
|
Reply to first post on this page
Back to LAMS for Tech-Heads - General Forum